In this dialogue, Robert Gressis (UCal Northridge) and Hugo Mercier ( French National Center for Scientific Research, Not Born Yesterday) discuss how human belief and manipulation work, and Hugo's research about why people aren't as manipulable as we sometimes think.
01:24 Hugo’s thesis: when it comes to communication, people are not easily manipulated, but hard to manipulate.
07:19 If people aren’t easily manipulated, then how does Hugo explain the success of Hitler, Pol Pot, and Trump?
16:07 Aren’t people easily manipulated by leaders who share their political orientation?
21:00 Do people really believe the crazy things they espouse?
28:36 What is the connection between belief and behavior? 35:45 Sperber and Mercier’s “interactionist” theory of reason
41:00 Twitter as a counterexample to the interactionist theory of reason
48:18 Are people good at arguing?
53:13 Rational rioters and the extraordinary heterogeneity of crowds
Why Crispin loves writing takedowns of cultural icons ... Crispin: Ludwig Wittgenstein is overrated ... Dan objects to people who try to live their...
Are we really as social as the Stoics believed? ... Distinguishing between the “objective” and the “real”... ... ...and between the “real” and representations...
Why does bad CGI make us feel weird? ... Where digital effects work (The Avengers) vs. where they don't (CATS) ... Gollum vs. Thanos,...