In this dialogue, Robert Gressis (UCal Northridge) and Hugo Mercier ( French National Center for Scientific Research, Not Born Yesterday) discuss how human belief and manipulation work, and Hugo's research about why people aren't as manipulable as we sometimes think.
01:24 Hugo’s thesis: when it comes to communication, people are not easily manipulated, but hard to manipulate.
07:19 If people aren’t easily manipulated, then how does Hugo explain the success of Hitler, Pol Pot, and Trump?
16:07 Aren’t people easily manipulated by leaders who share their political orientation?
21:00 Do people really believe the crazy things they espouse?
28:36 What is the connection between belief and behavior? 35:45 Sperber and Mercier’s “interactionist” theory of reason
41:00 Twitter as a counterexample to the interactionist theory of reason
48:18 Are people good at arguing?
53:13 Rational rioters and the extraordinary heterogeneity of crowds
Kevin Currie-Knight and Sheena Mason (SUNY Oneonta) discuss Sheena's theory of racelessness, why she is a race skeptic and eliminativist, and their mutual interest...
EA's own Kevin Currie-Knight and I discuss our respective essays, Growing up Metal and Growing up Grunge. We talk about the appeal of heavy...
Robert Gressis (California State Northridge) and Kevin Currie-Knight (East Carolina University) hae a wide-ranging conversation about the (fraught?) relationship between schooling, learning, and A-F...